Division on Visual Impairments

VIDBEQ.68.4.Fall.2023

A quarterly newsletter from the Council for Exceptional Children's Division on Visual Impairments containing practitioner tips for Teachers of Students with Visual Impairments, Certified Orientation and Mobility Specialists, and other professionals.

Issue link: http://dvi.uberflip.com/i/1512122

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 66 of 102

VIDBE-Q Volume 68 Issue 4 67 point Arial font. Teagan, age 13 years, also had hereditary optic atrophy. His acuity with best correction was 20/400, and his recommended reading medium was digital, with the ability to use a video magnifier or magnification software to adjust magnification to preference as needed. To read the passages in this study, Teagan used a video magnifier at 6X power with an inverted white on black color display. Procedures Individual baselines were established by comparing participant results on both the Read Naturally placement packet and the Basic Reading Inventory (BRI) assessment (Johns, 2016). The BRI includes graded passages and word lists and procedures for determining reading level and fluency. In an evaluation of psychometric evidence, Bieber et al. (2015) found that the BRI provides an adequate measure of reading fluency and can provide support for decisions about reading fluency placement for interventions. The BRI word lists and passages were used to estimate baseline reading levels. The Read Naturally placement packet was used to compare and confirm the proposed placement level. The researchers allowed for accuracy (Correct Words Per Passage) to guide instructional level placement instead of fluency per minute. This was a purposeful decision to prevent initial placement at a lower grade level than appropriate due to the potential impact of large print media and/or magnification devices on reading speed. Once initial placement was made, both

Articles in this issue

view archives of Division on Visual Impairments - VIDBEQ.68.4.Fall.2023