Division on Visual Impairments

VIDBEQ.68.4.Fall.2023

A quarterly newsletter from the Council for Exceptional Children's Division on Visual Impairments containing practitioner tips for Teachers of Students with Visual Impairments, Certified Orientation and Mobility Specialists, and other professionals.

Issue link: http://dvi.uberflip.com/i/1512122

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 64 of 102

VIDBE-Q Volume 68 Issue 4 65 Read Naturally provides a set of adapted materials in braille for students with visual impairments who use that medium, but there is no provision for large print readers. In addition, there is a document providing minimal guidelines for teachers using the program. However, there are no adaptations of the placement strategy or procedures beyond these minimal guidelines. The document provided includes a section called Note to Teachers About Large Print, which states the following: If a student requires a font size of 24 pt. or larger, very few words can be placed on each line…When a student reads very few words on each line and must move frequently from line to line, the student's fluency is not efficient." This note continues to say that "We find that enlarging the font beyond 24 points defeats the purpose of our program. Rather than enlarging beyond the recommendations, it should be determined whether the student could benefit from the program by accessing the materials through the use of a magnification device (CCTV), software (Zoomtext), or possibly learn braille. These decisions should be made after consultation with a teacher of students with visual impairments. (Read Naturally, 2021, p. 2) The point is well made that guidance from a TVI is necessary for any successful adaptation of a reading intervention for students with low vision. However, this document may discourage educators from using this intervention with students with low vision, not only because of the lack of guidance on appropriate adaptations, but by stating that enlarged font sizes "defeat the purpose" of the program. However, Layton and Koenig (1998), Patillo et. al. (2004), and Saviano and Hatton (2013) found that interventions based on repeated readings

Articles in this issue

view archives of Division on Visual Impairments - VIDBEQ.68.4.Fall.2023