;
Lorem Ipsum Dolor Spring 2016
26
Cattaneo, Z. & Vecchi, T.(2011). Blind vision. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts
Institute of Technology.
Charmaz, K. (2003). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods.
In Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative
inquiry2nd ed., 249-291.
City, E. A., Elmore, R. F., Fiarman, S.E., & Teitel, L. (2009). Instructional
rounds in education: A network approach to improving teaching and
learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Elstgeest, J. (2001). The right question at the right time. In Harlen, W. (2001).
Primary science: Taking the plunge 2
nd
ed. (pp.25-35). Portsmouth, NH:
Heinemann.
Jones, M. G., Minogue, J., Oppewal, T., Cook, M. P., & Broadwell, B. (2006).
Visualizing without vision as the microscale: Students with visual
Impairments explore cells with touch. Journal of Science Education &
Technology, 15(5/6), 345-351.
McNeill, K.L. & Krajcik, J. (2011). Supporting grade 5–8 students in
constructing explanations in science: The claim, evidence and
reasoning framework for talk and writing. Boston, MA: Pearson
Education.
Lynch, S., Taymans, J., Watson, W., Ochesendorf, R., Pyke, C., & Szesze,
M. (2007). Effectiveness of a highly rated science curriculum for
students with disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional
Children. 73(2), 202-223.
Mastopieri, M. (2005). Margo Mastopieri on science education and students
with disabilities. In Carin, A., Bass, J., & Contant, T. (Eds.), Teaching
science as inquiry (pp. 287-288). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:
Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
Mastropieri, M., Sruggs, T., Boon, R., & Butcher Carter, K. (2001). Correlates
of inquiry learning in science. Remedial and Special Education, 22(3),
130-137.
53
