Division on Visual Impairments

DVI Quarterly Volume 58(2)

A quarterly newsletter from the Council for Exceptional Children's Division on Visual Impairments containing practitioner tips for Teachers of Students with Visual Impairments, Certified Orientation and Mobility Specialists, and other professionals.

Issue link: http://dvi.uberflip.com/i/216471

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 34 of 53

students with visual impairments (TSVIs). The visual conditions of the participants varied as did their amount of vision, ranging from 20/200 to total blindness. Each participant shared their immigration story as it related to their individual family and personal background including information about their visual impairment. Findings Themes that emerged from these interviews were identified by participants as essential in contributing or impeding success in school. These themes included language, culture, personal satisfaction, family, and goals for the future. Language and Maintenance All of the participants in this study learned English when they came to the United States and did not speak English in their native country. Languages represented were Somali, Arabic, Spanish, Hmong, Vietnamese, Tagalong, Chinese, and Japanese. Participants received language instruction while at school in the U.S. and practiced a great deal. Immersion helped them learn English as did the television and radio. Factors that contributed to the speed and quality of the second language acquisition were age when they came to the United States, personal motivation, family support, and encouragement by teachers. All participants maintained their native language by using it at home or with a community that used that language. None received instruction in their native language at school in the U.S. The participants did not have access to educational materials in any medium (braille/large print) that supported the maintenance of their native language. The participants reported that their teachers in the U.S. did not encourage them to use their native language at school, nor did teachers attempt to communicate with students in their native language. Five participants felt they were bilingual 35

Articles in this issue

view archives of Division on Visual Impairments - DVI Quarterly Volume 58(2)