Division on Visual Impairments

VIDBEQ.70.4.Fall.2025

A quarterly newsletter from the Council for Exceptional Children's Division on Visual Impairments containing practitioner tips for Teachers of Students with Visual Impairments, Certified Orientation and Mobility Specialists, and other professionals.

Issue link: http://dvi.uberflip.com/i/1541912

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 30 of 199

VIDBE-Q 2025 Volume 70 Issue 4 analysis makes it possible to draw certain conclusions and establish connections with policies and scientific literature from different countries. The discussion is framed around the four key themes highlighted in the results, namely, 1) Physical participation 2) Adaptation of equipment; 3) Obstacles; 4) Unequal presence of support and 5) Facilitators. Physical Participation Firstly, the physical participation in PE seems to be respected, in inclusive and special school, in accordance with the LHAND. Nevertheless, the number of hours seems to be different in both contexts. Students enrolled in inclusive schools participate in PE classes as prescribed by the regular curriculum (3 periods of 45 minutes/week), whereas those in special schools appear to have access to a reduced number of such classes (60 minutes /week. Thus, it can be observed that the provision of PE differs, even though the curriculum and the guidelines are the same. This finding is positive, unlike other contexts that have reported the exclusion of students from classes and participation in different activities during PE classes (Alves et al., 2018; Haegele et al., 2022). While the observed physical participation of students in PE is an encouraging finding, physical presence alone does not guarantee meaningful inclusion and, in the absence of appropriate pedagogical practices, may even result in a form of "dumping ground" (Haegele, 2019). In other word, experience depicted by the students revealed that students are 31

Articles in this issue

view archives of Division on Visual Impairments - VIDBEQ.70.4.Fall.2025