Division on Visual Impairments

VIDBE-Q Volume 66, Issue 2 56 References Bruce, S. M., Trief, E., & Cascella, P. W. (2011). Teachers' and speech-language pathologists' perceptions about a tangible symbols intervention: Efficacy, generalization, and recommendations. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 172-182. Rowland, C., & Schweigert, P. (1989). Tangible symbols: Symbolic communication for individuals with multisensory impairment. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 226-234. Rowland, C., & Schweigert, P. (2000). Tangible symbols, tangible outcomes. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 61-76.

• Cover Page
• Table of Contents
• Message from the Editor
• President's Message
• Virginia Murray Sowell Student of the Year
• Deborah D. Hatton Dissertation of the Year
• Teacher of the Year
• Advocate of the Year
• Distinguished Service Award
• Functional Vision Assessment: Delphi Study Results and Where We Need to Go
• The Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC)/Cortical Visual Impairment (CVI) Matrix: Unique Considerations for Integrated Assessment and Intervention
• Using a Cohort Model to Address Cortical Visual Impairment in New York City
• Strategies for Teaching Tactile Tangible Symbol Systems: Case Study on a Learner with Deafblindness
• Lessons for Reading and Contributing to Research: Findings and Implications from a Descriptive Review of Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness
• Going Virtual for Students with Visual Impairments: Providing Education and Programs for Children Birth to 22
• Peer Support Arrangements for Students with Visual Impairments
• Service Determination for Students who are Blind/Visually Impaired